The United States construction industry is anchored in an intricate supply chain encompassing locally sourced raw materials, international trade, and global market dynamics. While many essential building components—such as aggregates, cement, and steel—are produced domestically, the supply chain also heavily relies on strategic imports. This article presents an academic yet accessible overview of which construction materials originate in the U.S., which are exported, and which are imported—and why these trade patterns matter for industry resilience and policymaking.

Domestic Production

Aggregates (Sand, Gravel, Crushed Stone)

These foundational materials almost entirely originate in the U.S. There are around 6,500 gravel pits across states such as California, Texas, Arizona, Minnesota, and Michigan—all contributing to a robust domestic aggregates industry (ConstructConnect). Vulcan Materials Company, America’s largest producer of crushed stone, sand, and gravel, operates over 400 facilities and employs approximately 12,000 personnel (Wikipedia).

Cement

In 2024, the U.S. had 99 cement plants across 34 states, the bulk of which produced Portland and blended cement (ConstructConnect). Yet, the country still relied on net imports for 22% of its consumption—primarily from Turkey (32%), Canada (22%), and Vietnam (10%) (ConstructConnect).

Steel

U.S. steel production in 2024 largely came from electric arc furnaces (72%), with construction accounting for 28% of domestic shipments (ConstructConnect). Even so, the U.S. remained a net importer, with about 13% of steel consumption met through imports—especially from Canada (23%), Mexico (16%), Brazil (13%), and South Korea (9%) (ConstructConnect).

Exports

U.S. exports of building materials are relatively modest compared to domestic usage. Monthly data shows exports in early 2024 hovered around US $629–646 million, peaking at approximately US $702 million in November 2023 (Trading Economics). Overall export volumes for heavy construction materials remain small and are often dwarfed by domestic production and consumption.

Imports

Import Share and Spending

In 2023, total U.S. residential construction materials consumed were valued at US $184 billion—with imports constituting only 7% (~US $13 billion) (notifix.info, Industry Intelligence Inc.). The following year, 2024, saw consumption rise to roughly US $204 billion, with imports still accounting for about 7% (~US $14 billion) (Nahb).

However, when accounting for nonmetal building materials, imports reached approximately US $45.7 billion in 2024 (YCharts).

Primary Imported Materials and Sources

• Steel and Aluminum: In 2024, U.S. imported US $49.7 billion in steel and US $27.4 billion in aluminum, largely from Canada, China, and Mexico (Reuters). Steel accounts for about one-quarter of domestic consumption; roughly 50% of aluminum used in the U.S. is imported, mostly from Canada (Reuters, AP News).
• Wood (Lumber): Canada supplied around 70% of U.S. softwood lumber and sawmill products—valued at US $5.8 billion in 2023; total lumber imports surged toward US $20 billion in 2022 (CFMA, The Wall Street Journal).
• Cement and Gypsum: Cement imports (net) composed 22% of U.S. consumption in 2024; gypsum products (used in drywall) were largely imported from Mexico and Canada (ConstructConnect, The Wall Street Journal).
• Other Materials: Imports also include non‑metal construction staples such as granite, arc glass, porcelain tile, and marble (CFMA, MSC). Additionally, construction components may include appliances and framed elements—China covering a significant share (notifix.info, AP News).

Strategic Importance

The U.S. is the second-largest importer of building construction materials globally, relying on a diverse set of suppliers—including China, South Korea, and Germany (CFMA).

Policy Dynamics & Tariff Impacts

Tariffs and trade policies significantly shape these supply dynamics. For example:

• Proposed tariffs (10–20% general; 60% on Chinese imports) could increase annual costs by US $3.2–4.2 billion (notifix.info, Lesprom Network).
• Earlier tariffs targeting steel and aluminum (25% to 50%) raised costs for consumers and industries, recognizing the limited capacity of domestic producers to substitute these imports (Reuters, AP News).
• Builders anticipated increased costs of US $7,500–10,000 per single-family home due to tariff-driven price hikes on lumber and gypsum (AP News, The Wall Street Journal).

The U.S. construction industry relies profoundly on domestic production for core materials like aggregates, cement, and structural steel but cannot escape import reliance—particularly for high-quality steel, aluminum, lumber, gypsum, and specialized finishes.

While imports overall may represent only about 7%–13% of total consumption, policy shifts (tariffs, trade deals) and global supply chain disruptions can disproportionately influence cost structures and project timelines. Thus, policymakers and industry leaders must continually assess both domestic capacity and international supply dynamics to ensure resilience, affordability, and sustainability.

References

• NAHB: US $184B materials used; US $13B imported in 2023 (7%) (notifix.info, Industry Intelligence Inc.)
• 2024: US $204B materials; ~7% imported (~US $14B) (Nahb)
• Aggregates domestic sourcing, gravel pits, Vulcan Materials Company info (ConstructConnect, Wikipedia)
• Cement production and import share; import origins (ConstructConnect)
• Steel production and imports; country breakdown (ConstructConnect)
• Export levels of building materials (trade-economics) (Trading Economics)
• Non-metal building materials imports ~US $45.7B in 2024 (YCharts)
• Steel and aluminum import values, industry dependency (Reuters, AP News)
• Lumber/wood import data, Canada share (CFMA, The Wall Street Journal)
• Cement and gypsum import reliance (ConstructConnect, The Wall Street Journal)
• Other imported materials: granite, tile, glass, appliances (CFMA, MSC, notifix.info, AP News)
• Importer ranking globally (CFMA)
• Tariff cost projections and impacts (notifix.info, Lesprom Network)
• Tariffs on steel & aluminum costs; domestic capacity limits (Reuters, AP News)
• Cost impact per home due to tariffs (AP News, The Wall Street Journal)

John Caravella Esq., is a construction attorney and formerly practicing project architect at The Law Office of John Caravella, P.C., representing architects, engineers, contractors, subcontractors, and owners in all phases of contract preparation, litigation, and arbitration across New York and Florida. He also serves as an arbitrator to the American Arbitration Association Construction Industry Panel. Mr. Caravella can be reached by email: John@LIConstructionLaw.com or (631) 608-1346.

The information provided on this website does not, and is not intended to, constitute legal advice; instead, all information, content, and materials available on this site are for general informational purposes only.  Readers of this website should contact their attorney to obtain advice with respect to any particular legal matter.  No reader, user, or browser of this site should act or refrain from acting on the basis of information on this site without first seeking legal advice from counsel in the relevant jurisdiction.  Only your individual attorney can provide assurances that the information contained herein – and your interpretation of it – is applicable or appropriate to your particular situation.  Use of, and access to, this website or any of the links or resources contained within the site do not create an attorney-client relationship between the reader, user, or browser and website authors, contributors, contributing law firms, or committee members and their respective employers.