New York’s recent decision to ban natural gas in many new construction projects has sparked a heated debate. Originally designed as a bold climate policy, the gas ban is now paused, with critics arguing it is both impractical and unconstitutional. Here’s a breakdown of the situation: why the ban is on hold, the legal challenges it faces, and why some consider it unconstitutional.

What the New York Gas Ban Entails

In 2023, New York passed the All-Electric Buildings Act, prohibiting the installation of natural gas, propane, and heating oil systems in most new buildings up to seven stories tall, beginning January 1, 2026. For taller buildings, the ban is phased in starting January 1, 2029. The goal of the law is to reduce greenhouse gas emissions from buildings, supporting New York’s broader climate objectives. The law includes certain exemptions, such as for emergency generators, commercial kitchens, and critical infrastructure.

Why the Ban Is Paused

The ban is currently suspended due to ongoing litigation. A coalition of home builders, propane and gas companies, and labor unions challenged the law in federal court, arguing that it is preempted by federal energy regulations. Although a district court upheld the law, the plaintiffs appealed, resulting in a pause of the law’s implementation during the appellate process. If the appeal fails, enforcement would resume after a grace period, giving builders and regulators time to adjust.

Legal and Constitutional Challenges

Opponents claim the ban is unconstitutional and exceeds the state’s authority. The main arguments include:

• Federal Preemption: Critics argue that federal law regulates the energy efficiency of appliances, and states cannot impose conflicting requirements. By banning gas appliances, the law allegedly intrudes into a federally governed area.
• Economic Impacts: Mandating all-electric buildings could increase construction costs, slow development, and reduce housing affordability. Opponents also point to potential risks to electric grid reliability.
• Regulatory Overreach: Some argue the law interferes with the freedom of builders and homeowners to choose their preferred energy systems, limiting economic liberty.

Plaintiffs have also pointed out that the ban creates immediate economic harm for businesses and workers who rely on gas appliance installation, providing grounds to challenge the law before it fully takes effect.

Arguments in Favor of the Ban

Proponents emphasize the climate benefits, highlighting that buildings are a major source of carbon emissions. Transitioning to all-electric construction could significantly reduce greenhouse gas emissions over time. Additionally, electric systems like heat pumps can offer long-term cost savings, and the law includes exemptions to address grid capacity and critical needs.

The Next Steps

The outcome of the appeal in the Second Circuit Court of Appeals will determine the future of the gas ban. A favorable ruling for the challengers could limit states’ ability to phase out fossil fuels, while an upholding could encourage other states to adopt similar policies. In the meantime, the pause allows regulators, utilities, and builders more time to prepare.

The New York gas ban sits at the intersection of climate policy, state regulation, federal authority, and economic freedom. Its ultimate fate will not only affect the construction industry in New York but could also set precedents for how far states can go in regulating energy use in buildings. The debate highlights the challenges of balancing environmental goals with economic and legal realities.

The information provided on this website does not, and is not intended to, constitute legal advice; instead, all information, content, and materials available on this site are for general informational purposes only.  Readers of this website should contact their attorney to obtain advice with respect to any particular legal matter.  No reader, user, or browser of this site should act or refrain from acting on the basis of information on this site without first seeking legal advice from counsel in the relevant jurisdiction.  Only your individual attorney can provide assurances that the information contained herein – and your interpretation of it – is applicable or appropriate to your particular situation.  Use of, and access to, this website or any of the links or resources contained within the site do not create an attorney-client relationship between the reader, user, or browser and website authors, contributors, contributing law firms, or committee members and their respective employers.

Resources

Here are direct links to the resources you requested:

• “New York Gas Ban Suspended While NAHB and NYSBA Appeal” (National Association of Home Builders): https://www.nahb.org/blog/2025/11/new-york-gas-ban-suspended (National Association of Home Builders)
• “NAHB Joins New York Builders to Challenge State’s Unlawful Gas Ban”: https://www.nahb.org/blog/2023/10/nahb-lawsuit (National Association of Home Builders)
• Complaint & standing arguments in Mulhern Gas Co. v. Rodriguez: https://www.npga.org/wp-content/uploads/2023/10/2023-10-12-Complaint-Mulhern-Gas-v-Rodriguez.pdf (NPGA)
• Press release by National Propane Gas Association (NPGA) on the New York gas ban: https://www.npga.org/wp-content/uploads/2023/10/NY-Gas-Ban-Press-Release_FINAL-1.pdf (NPGA)
• Draft 2024 Fuel Gas Code from New York State Department of State: https://dos.ny.gov/2024-03-19fgcnrd-documentdraft-version-30 (Department of State)
• Coverage of the delayed implementation from the Times Union: https://www.timesunion.com/capitol/article/new-york-agrees-delay-all-electric-buildings-act-21169253.php (com)